News / Articles

11/01/25 - "Critique" - Learn to evaluate your work with purpose and intent.

Published on 10/8/2025

New Breakout Session:

"Critique" at the North Carolina Furniture School
3749 W Wilson St.
Farmville, NC 27828

Join us on Saturday November 1st and learn to evaluate your work with purpose and intent. We will meet at North Carolina Furniture School from 1:00 pm to 4:00pm. Stuart Kent, who recently conducted a demonstration on "Design" for WGNC, will host and moderate the discussion in the tradition of a formal collegiate art school critique, which is a structured, academic evaluation of a person's creative work. It is a core component of art design education, intended to develop critical thinking, visual literacy, and the ability to articulate and defend artistic decisions.
Below is how it typically works and what defines it:

1. Setting and Format
Critiques are conducted in a studio or gallery-style classroom where the creattive work is displayed for group discussion. The atmosphere is formal but conversational. The group gathers around each student’s work in turn, led by a faculty member or a panel of instructors, and sometimes with visiting artists or critics.

2. Presentation by the Artist
The participant begins by presenting their work, offering:
• concept or intent behind the piece
• materials, techniques, and process used
• context or influences relevant to their approach
This presentation is concise and sets the stage for others to interpret and respond.

3. Peer and Faculty Response
After the artist’s introduction, classmates and instructors provide structured feedback. The goal is not simply to praise or criticize, but to analyze and interpret the work’s formal, conceptual, and technical qualities. Discussion often includes:
• Formal Analysis: Composition, color, line, texture, form, and overall visual impact.
• Conceptual Analysis: Meaning, symbolism, originality, and emotional resonance.
• Technical Evaluation: Craftsmanship, materials handling, and execution.
• Contextual Reflection: How the work relates to contemporary practice, art history, or cultural themes.
Participants are encouraged to speak critically in a constructive manner, with respect and intrinsic commitment to helping their fellow maker understand ways to appreciate and improve their work. Participants need to support their opinions with clear reasoning rather than personal taste.

4. Instructor Guidance The instructor moderates the critique, ensuring the discussion remains constructive and rigorous. They may:
• Highlight key points made by peers
• Offer professional insight or historical context
• Challenge the artist to rethink certain decisions
• Suggest directions for future development
Faculty often model the language of criticism—objective, articulate, and analytical—so students learn to critique thoughtfully rather than emotionally.

5. The Maker’s Reflection
At the end, the maker may respond to the critique, clarifying intentions or asking follow-up questions.

6. Tone and Purpose
The tone is intellectual, serious, and collegial. The purpose is growth, not judgment. A successful critique leaves the student with:
• A clearer understanding of their strengths and weaknesses
• Practical strategies for improvement
• Greater confidence in discussing their work
• A deeper sense of how their art communicates to others

Return to Previous Page